14-07-2021, 07:33 AM
Blobs post_id=27706 time= user_id=758 Wrote:tellyblues post_id=27669 time= user_id=1333 Wrote:Blobs post_id=27655 time= user_id=758 Wrote:That's because the anti BBC sentiment is being stirred up by certain media outlets with vested interests who actually don't care about the output or who enjoys what.
Nonsense.
So nobody is able to form their own opinion of the BBC based on what they themselves think about its output? It's all because of the media?
Why is it that when someone suggests getting rid of something they are jumped on and accused of "getting rid of stuff they don't like" yet when someone who says they are happy paying the licence fee for the content it gives them (coincidentally no mention of what anyone else gets), not a cheep?
No, I'm not saying you can't form an independent opinion of the one show. I'm saying there's a narrative the likes of the sun, mail and express push that isn't always based in reality. Like how they think Glastonbury can be covered by just Jo Whiley and one camera man for example.
Which is nothing to do with the views expressed here. I genuinely don't think that the media is influencing anyone's judgement on what they think the BBC should provide.
