28-04-2021, 04:11 PM
House post_id=9413 time=1619596584 user_id=1266 Wrote:What I actually find more surprising is how long the presenters have lasted on Good Morning Britain, given how turbulent it was between GMTV closing and GMB starting. In trying to emulate the US morning show model a bit more, they’ve partly realised that you need stability to build an onscreen family, which means giving them time. It still feels like a confident programme, and the fact that it’s core brand, personalities (Morgan the notable exception) and format hasn’t had any sudden or unnatural changes has helped audiences feel comfortable buying into GMB as part of their daily routine, where an ever-changing programme makes audiences nervous. I think they’ve realised that making GMB a success in the long term means finding elements that can be built into a known quantity, rather than rethinking everything over and over again.
Good Morning Britain is what Daybreak should have been from day 1, and actually I think Adrian Chiles could have found success on the GMB format in a way he wasn’t well suited to Daybreak (though Christine Bleakley couldn’t have been involved in such a news-centred programme).
I think Christine has certainly found her niche now with Lorraine and Loose Women, and I would argue that she is the best deputy/No.2 presenter on Lorraine since Kate stepped down in the late 2014 ahead of covering Charlotte's maternity leave on GMB.
