![]() |
|
GB News - Printable Version +- TV Live Forum (https://www.tvliveforum.com) +-- Forum: TV Live Forum (https://www.tvliveforum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: News (https://www.tvliveforum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: GB News (/showthread.php?tid=505) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
|
GB News - London Lite - 18-09-2021 TVViewer256 post_id=40637 time= user_id=1039 Wrote:thecorrector post_id=40631 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:Latest Guardian piece on GBN suggests that:Whilst undoubtedly some of this may be true, the Guardian hasn't exactly got a perfect track record on the goings-on at GB News so I'd take it with a pinch of salt. An issue with the Guardian and this topic is its natural left-leaning bias which will make it dislike the concept of GB News. Just like you'd have to take it with a pinch of salt if The Sun or Spectator reported at infighting at the BBC or Channel 4. Private Eye also reports on negative stories about News UK publications and the Guardian, Mirror etc. I doubt they have any bias when it comes to journalists giving them insider stories from their newsrooms to report on. GB News - RR - 18-09-2021 Brekkie post_id=40645 time= user_id=976 Wrote:The supposed naivety of Andrew Neil, somebody who knows the industry and the political landscape and chose to ignore the numerous red flags from observers and believe what he was being told just shows how dangerous politically slanted news operations can be.What's more he was the face of the channel in the weeks leading up to launch, getting it coverage in the press that it is likely that no one else there at the time would have been able to do. Was he as "chairman" taken in by the others, and it is only on launch he saw the programming and what was happening? All very strange. I'm sure one day the full story will be told. GB News - Fluffy Bunny Feet - 18-09-2021 London Lite post_id=40615 time= user_id=953 Wrote:thecorrector post_id=40611 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:You’d think the prospect of having a rival park their much bigger, slicker and more well-resourced tank on your lawn might prompt GBN to try widening the scope of its programming, but no, sticking very much to type this evening: Well as someone who used to work in MSM (ITV and Sky) this is just extraordinary. You have to ask yourself if he actually believes what he's saying. This strikes me so much like the Fox/CNN continual on-air spats which was not unexpected but pathetic. So if Colin Brazier does not like the BBC, don't watch it - and all this harping about them, when the Murdoch owned station is on the horizon does not bode well for his station survival. Perhaps they should be focusing on what they can improve on their output rather than simply increase the echo from their output IMHO. GB News - Inspector Sands - 18-09-2021 By the way, whatever happened with GB News' radio station? That's gone oddly quiet, they've had the slot, or it's at least been ready for them since July and a September launch was expected GB News - Fluffy Bunny Feet - 18-09-2021 Inspector Sands post_id=40656 time= user_id=1003 Wrote:By the way, whatever happened with GB News' radio station? That's gone oddly quiet, they've had the slot, or it's at least been ready for them since July and a September launch was expectedI always thought GBN will go down the Youtube route like LBC too, but as you say no sign of it yet. Maybe they are trying to focus on the TV output first as it's more expensive then simulcast on radio. GB News - Jon - 18-09-2021 Fluffy Bunny Feet post_id=40657 time= user_id=1311 Wrote:I don’t understand this, GBN is on YouTube like LBC. It’s just not on radio like LBC.Inspector Sands post_id=40656 time= user_id=1003 Wrote:By the way, whatever happened with GB News' radio station? That's gone oddly quiet, they've had the slot, or it's at least been ready for them since July and a September launch was expectedI always thought GBN will go down the Youtube route like LBC too, but as you say no sign of it yet. GB News - Inspector Sands - 18-09-2021 Fluffy Bunny Feet post_id=40657 time= user_id=1311 Wrote:The main cost of radio will be the carriage, and they're presumably paying for that to reserve the slotInspector Sands post_id=40656 time= user_id=1003 Wrote:By the way, whatever happened with GB News' radio station? That's gone oddly quiet, they've had the slot, or it's at least been ready for them since July and a September launch was expectedI always thought GBN will go down the Youtube route like LBC too, but as you say no sign of it yet. GB News - TVViewer256 - 18-09-2021 James2001 post_id=40644 time= user_id=956 Wrote:I haven't personally got a problem with The Guardian, and I agree that it gets many things right. However, some 'insider info' (such as Martin Daubney joining) has proven to be wrong which makes you question to what extent everything else is correct or not.TVViewer256 post_id=40637 time= user_id=1039 Wrote:thecorrector post_id=40631 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:Latest Guardian piece on GBN suggests that:Whilst undoubtedly some of this may be true, the Guardian hasn't exactly got a perfect track record on the goings-on at GB News so I'd take it with a pinch of salt. An issue with the Guardian and this topic is its natural left-leaning bias which will make it dislike the concept of GB News. Just like you'd have to take it with a pinch of salt if The Sun or Spectator reported at infighting at the BBC or Channel 4. GB News - majesticbass - 18-09-2021 thecorrector post_id=40611 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:You’d think the prospect of having a rival park their much bigger, slicker and more well-resourced tank on your lawn might prompt GBN to try widening the scope of its programming, but no, sticking very much to type this evening: I don't understand how this can possibly comply with the rules for impartiality. I see the catch up facility is off line, but I doubt there was any counter point that the BBC is useful or anything like that anywhere in the schedules. Is OFCOM actually monitoring this, as their idea that it can be balanced over a whole schedule makes it essentially impossible for anyone without the resources to watch 24/7 to make any kind of informed complaint. GB News - thecorrector - 18-09-2021 TVViewer256 post_id=40637 time= user_id=1039 Wrote:What has the Guardian got wrong in its reporting of GBN? Jim Waterson is very well-connected and it seems like you resent any criticism of the channel.thecorrector post_id=40631 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:Latest Guardian piece on GBN suggests that:Whilst undoubtedly some of this may be true, the Guardian hasn't exactly got a perfect track record on the goings-on at GB News so I'd take it with a pinch of salt. EDIT: As far as Martin Daubney goes, he was described as a “potential presenter” - the paper never claimed he was a cert to join. GB News - London Lite - 18-09-2021 majesticbass post_id=40666 time= user_id=1061 Wrote:thecorrector post_id=40611 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:You’d think the prospect of having a rival park their much bigger, slicker and more well-resourced tank on your lawn might prompt GBN to try widening the scope of its programming, but no, sticking very much to type this evening: Ofcom didn't sanction GB News for disinformation spread by Dan Wootton claiming that the channel output throughout the day counteracts any comments made by him, so it's unlikely they'll receive a sanction for bashing the BBC. GB News - Brekkie - 18-09-2021 majesticbass post_id=40666 time= user_id=1061 Wrote:I don't understand how this can possibly comply with the rules for impartiality. I see the catch up facility is off line, but I doubt there was any counter point that the BBC is useful or anything like that anywhere in the schedules.Exactly, especially when you consider how most people see the content now. Even if the rest of the hour was made up of a full defence of the BBC it is the two minute criticism that the channel retweets, and as seen as the tweet highlighted yesterday if they get someone on to counter an argument they can cut their response off when sharing content on social media. Obviously OFCOM don't regulate that side of things but it is perhaps something they should give more weight too in their judgements as it clearly shows the intentions of the channel. Whilst I get why OFCOM says things need to be taken as a whole they also need to be taken in context of what the channel is quite clearly trying to achieve. For me balance across a schedule is about trying to allow a range of voices to be heard on a series of programmes, or a special season, where rather than countering an argument within the same broadcast it may make sense to do so across different episodes - for example in election programming where the Tories may be the focus of one episode and Labour the focus of another. Even then though it is rare for a programme to be 100% one sided on the situation. I struggle though to see how they can say their is even balance across the schedule when they are clearly relegating those with opposing views to lesser slots and bringing in more that toe the company line. Of their highest profile even vaguely left-wing presenters one got the sack and the other was axed from a primetime slot to bring in someone whose views more align with that of the company and those behind it. GB News - bfgarmy - 18-09-2021 thecorrector post_id=40611 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:You’d think the prospect of having a rival park their much bigger, slicker and more well-resourced tank on your lawn might prompt GBN to try widening the scope of its programming, but no, sticking very much to type this evening: Yikes, Colin has gone off the deep end. And this sort of clip just sums up the state of the channel and how it doesn't match the hype it gave pre launch. It said it would cover stories that are undercovered and be all about free speech then you get a presenter ranting that somebody at the BBC has a view they might disagree with and covering a proper 'media bubble' story. Does Donna from Doncaster give two hoots who Jim Waterson and Jess Braemer are or who’s in charge of the BBC News Channel - one big criticism of the current media anyway is that it covers the media far too heavily and GB News seem even worse at that then the usual mainstays. Frankly Murdoch seems to have outthought GB News. He's let them run first and make a show of themselves and make all the errors and draw all the ire so then he can launch his output and it'll likely draw less ire and have learnt from the lessons of GB News. GB News - bfgarmy - 18-09-2021 thecorrector post_id=40670 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:TVViewer256 post_id=40637 time= user_id=1039 Wrote:What has the Guardian got wrong in its reporting of GBN? Jim Waterson is very well-connected and it seems like you resent any criticism of the channel.thecorrector post_id=40631 time= user_id=1692 Wrote:Latest Guardian piece on GBN suggests that:Whilst undoubtedly some of this may be true, the Guardian hasn't exactly got a perfect track record on the goings-on at GB News so I'd take it with a pinch of salt. Indeed some here seem to act as if say The Guardian are just making things up about GB News for shits and giggles. While I've no doubt that The Guardian's views don't align with GB News and they'd happily see it shut down, The Guardian will feel it has a reputation to uphold and won't just go around printing wild untruths particularly around something as minor as GB News. And the fact other outlets are reporting very similar to the Guardian most of the time suggests too there is an element to truth. Also, just because something they suggested didn't happen it doesn't mean everything they say is false. For all we know Daubney (who I'm not aware of) may well have been considered to join/things may have got to a late stage before he or GB News pulled out. People on here were very quick to write off the idea that Andrew Neil was getting cold feet on GB News and yet that turned out to be spot on. GB News - Brekkie - 18-09-2021 The Times, The Telegraph and Guido have probably been more prevalent in covering the channel too, and generally not in a positive manner. |